ABSTRACT
Purpose@#We analyzed the choroidal thickness in the subfoveal area and area of retinal detachment (RD) in monocular primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients and compared the RD eye with the fellow eye. @*Methods@#We retrospectively analyzed, optical coherence tomography data of both eyes at the first visit in patients who underwent surgery for monocular RRD from January 2013 to December 2016. Choroidal thickness was examined manually in the subfoveal and RD areas by two independent ophthalmologists; subjects without data from at least one of the two investigators were excluded. @*Results@#Ninety-five subjects were included in this study. Of the 95 RD eyes, 61 (64.2%) and 44 (46.3%) eyes showed macula and fovea invasion, respectively. The subfoveal choroidal thickness was statistically significant in the RD eye compared with the fellow eye (244.7 ± 79.0 µm vs. 220.1 ± 78.9 µm; p < 0.001). Moreover, the choroidal thickness of the RD area in the RD eye was thicker compared with the non-detachment area and corresponding area in the fellow eye (273.8 ± 53.4 µm vs. 215.2 ± 44.0 µm and 233.3 ± 56.7 µm, respectively; p < 0.001). @*Conclusions@#In the primary RRD eye, the choroidal thickness in the detachment area was thicker than that of the fellow eye. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanism of choroidal thickness change and its impact on RD.
ABSTRACT
Purpose@#We analyzed the choroidal thickness in the subfoveal area and area of retinal detachment (RD) in monocular primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) patients and compared the RD eye with the fellow eye. @*Methods@#We retrospectively analyzed, optical coherence tomography data of both eyes at the first visit in patients who underwent surgery for monocular RRD from January 2013 to December 2016. Choroidal thickness was examined manually in the subfoveal and RD areas by two independent ophthalmologists; subjects without data from at least one of the two investigators were excluded. @*Results@#Ninety-five subjects were included in this study. Of the 95 RD eyes, 61 (64.2%) and 44 (46.3%) eyes showed macula and fovea invasion, respectively. The subfoveal choroidal thickness was statistically significant in the RD eye compared with the fellow eye (244.7 ± 79.0 µm vs. 220.1 ± 78.9 µm; p < 0.001). Moreover, the choroidal thickness of the RD area in the RD eye was thicker compared with the non-detachment area and corresponding area in the fellow eye (273.8 ± 53.4 µm vs. 215.2 ± 44.0 µm and 233.3 ± 56.7 µm, respectively; p < 0.001). @*Conclusions@#In the primary RRD eye, the choroidal thickness in the detachment area was thicker than that of the fellow eye. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanism of choroidal thickness change and its impact on RD.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To measure and analyze ocular deviations between dominant and non-dominant eyes using video-oculography (VOG) in intermittent exotropia. METHODS: Fourteen subjects who were diagnosed with intermittent exotropia from July 2017 to July 2018 with age of 5 or more, visual acuity of 20/30 or better and corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or more and difference in vision of both eyes of 1 line or less on Snellen optotype were included. The subjects were asked to fixate on a black-on-white optotype at 1 m, which subtended a visual angle of 50 minutes of arc. The video files and data about ocular deviations were obtained using VOG with alternate cover test. We analyzed angles of ocular deviations in dominant and non-dominant eyes. RESULTS: Among the 14 subjects in this study, the mean age were 7.6 ± 1.7 (range 5–9 years). Seven of 14 subjects had the right eye dominance. Six of the 14 subjects were men. There was no significant difference of ocular deviations between the dominant and non-dominant eyes in VOG (p = 0.167). Additionally, there was no significant difference of the values of VOG when one eye was exodeviated or re-fixated (p = 0.244), when both eyes were deviated, and when both eyes were re-fixated (p = 0.195, 0.637). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there was no significant difference of ocular deviations between the dominant and non-dominant eyes, between when an eye was exodeviated or fixated using VOG. Therefore, it may not be a problem even if alternate prism cover test is performed in any eye in intermittent exotropia of more than 50 prism diopter without amblyopia or refraction abnormality that could affect the uncorrected visual acuity.